Home / Articles

Analysis of Interdisciplinary Integration Strategies in Biology Education

Jiayi Zhang 1,*
1 Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China * Correspondence: Jiayi Zhang, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China

Vol. 22 (2026): 2026 3rd International Conference on the Frontiers of Social Sciences, Education, and the Development of Humanities Arts (EDHA 2026)

Received: 2026-06-13

Accepted: 2026-06-13

Published: 2026-06-13

Views:
Downloads: 95

Abstract

Against the backdrop of deepening reforms in basic education curricula, interdisciplinary integrated teaching has emerged as an important theoretical topic and practical direction in biology education. As a discipline that combines the rigor of natural science with the complexity of life phenomena, biology possesses a knowledge system that naturally intersects with chemistry, physics, mathematics, medicine, and the social sciences, thereby providing rich internal logical support for interdisciplinary integration. Nevertheless, existing research remains insufficient in its systematic analysis of integration strategies, particularly lacking comprehensive discussion at the levels of theoretical framework construction, integration pathway design, and teaching implementation mechanisms. Drawing on curriculum integration theory, STEM education theory, and constructivist learning theory as its analytical framework, this paper systematically examines the internal logic and practical pathways of interdisciplinary integration in biology teaching. It proposes a three-dimensional strategy model encompassing content integration, method integration, and context integration, and illustrates the model through representative domestic and international teaching cases. The findings indicate that well-designed interdisciplinary integration strategies not only enhance students’ systemic thinking, inquiry competence, and problem-solving abilities, but also promote the in-depth development of core biological literacy and scientific attitudes. The theoretical contribution of this study lies in providing an operationally viable analytical framework for interdisciplinary biology teaching, with meaningful implications for curriculum policy design, textbook development, and teacher professional learning.

Keywords

teaching strategies interdisciplinary integration biology education curriculum integration STEM education core literacy

References

[1] N. G. Lederman and M. L. Niess, "Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics?," School Science and Mathematics, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 57, 1997.

[2] J. Brophy and J. Alleman, "A caveat: Curriculum integration isn't always a good idea," Educational Leadership, vol. 49, no. 2, p. 66, 1991.

[3] H. Schweingruber, G. Pearson, and M. Honey, Eds., STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press, 2014.

[4] NGSS Lead States, Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press, 2013.

[5] C. M. Czerniak and C. C. Johnson, "Interdisciplinary science teaching," in Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II, Routledge, 2014, pp. 395-411.

[6] H. H. Jacobs, Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1989.

[7] S. Drake and R. Burns, Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. ASCD, 2004.

[8] T. R. Kelley and J. G. Knowles, "A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 11, 2016.

[9] I. Halinen, "The new educational curriculum in Finland," Improving the Quality of Childhood in Europe, vol. 7, pp. 75-89, 2018.

[10] K. Maton, "Cumulative and segmented learning: Exploring the role of curriculum structures in knowledge-building," British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 43-57, 2009.

[11] J. A. Beane, Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press, 1997.

[12] D. P. Ausubel, The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.

[13] J. Svoboda and C. Passmore, "The strategies of modeling in biology education," Science & Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 119-142, 2013.

[14] W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick, "A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, vol. 115, no. 772, pp. 700-721, 1927.

[15] L. S. Vygotsky and M. Cole, Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, 1978.

Copyright and License

Published in2026-06-13 15:28:34

DOI doi.org/10.70088/8mw2fc80

Creative Commons
Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/license s/by/4.0/).

Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by EDHA 2026

Journal Information

  • Vol. 22 (2026): 2026 3rd International Conference on the Frontiers of Social Sciences, Education, and the Development of Humanities Arts (EDHA 2026)
  • 2026-06-13
  • ISSN: (Print) 3078-770X/ (Online) 3078-7718
  • Journal Homepage

Related Articles