Home / Articles

Drawing Boundaries, Negotiating Existence: Lines and Critical Knowledge Production in British Contemporary Art

Tianshun Zhao 1, *, Menger Yuan 1, Liyijia Tuo 1 and Zhouxiang Long 1
1 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, The United Kingdom * Correspondence: Tianshun Zhao, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, The United Kingdom

Vol. 22 (2026): 2026 3rd International Conference on the Frontiers of Social Sciences, Education, and the Development of Humanities Arts (EDHA 2026)

Received: 2026-06-13

Accepted: 2026-06-13

Published: 2026-06-13

Views:
Downloads: 69

Abstract

This article takes "boundary work" as the main thread to study how lines in contemporary British art transcend their formal functions and become a medium for the production of critical knowledge. By integrating the theoretical framework of form, body, and society, and analyzing the recent works of three artists, Charles Avery, Antony Gormley, and Peng Zuqiang, it demonstrates that lines achieve the revelation, negotiation, and reconstruction of boundaries by deconstructing order, constructing a body field, and reorganizing social narratives. The conclusion states that this aesthetic reconfiguration of boundaries is an important perceptual politics, opening a critical cognitive path in the fragmented contemporary reality and pointing towards a more open future.

Keywords

boundary work critical form British contemporary art perception politics

References

[1] J. M. Kennedy, "The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art," 1980. doi: 10.2307/430327

[2] M. Merleau-Ponty, "Eye and mind," In Theatre and performance design, 2012, pp. 243-245.

[3] D. W. Winnicott, "La crainte de l'effondrement," Cliniques, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 16-28, 2019.

[4] T. Ingold, "The life of lines," Routledge, 2015.

[5] M. Griffith, "Three Hundred Years Hence," Boston: Gregg Press, vol. 2, 1975.

[6] X. Yi, L. Hong, E. Zhong, N. N. Liu, and S. Rajan, "Beyond clicks: dwell time for personalization," In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems, October, 2014, pp. 113-120.

[7] A. Freadman, "Untitled:(on genre)," Cultural Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67-99, 1988.

[8] C. Greenberg, "Modernist painting," In Modern art and Modernism, 2018, pp. 5-10. doi: 10.4324/9780429498909-2

[9] P. Williams II, "The God of How: Understanding How Trials, Transitions, and Triumphs Fit into God'S Plan for Your Life," iUniverse, 2013.

[10] A. Danto, "The artworld," The journal of philosophy, vol. 61, no. 19, pp. 571-584, 1964.

[11] D. Batchelor, "Chromophobia," Reaktion books, 2000.

[12] A. Schlitte, "Lines made by walking-On the aesthetic experience of landscape," Continental philosophy review, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 503-518, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11007-022-09572-1

[13] G. Deleuze, "Postscript on the Societies of Control," In Surveillance, crime and social control, 2017, pp. 35-39. doi: 10.4324/9781315242002-3

[14] D. P. McCormack, "Refrains for moving bodies: Experience and experiment in affective spaces," Duke University Press, 2014.

[15] C. Bishop, "Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship," Verso books, 2023.

[16] U. Deniflee, "The case of the missing voice," MAKE: The Magazine of Women's Art, no. 85, pp. 25-26, 1999.

[17] T. J. Demos, "The migrant image: The art and politics of documentary during global crisis," Duke University Press, 2013.

Copyright and License

Published in2026-06-13 17:41:15

DOI doi.org/10.70088/d5kwrc56

Creative Commons
Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/license s/by/4.0/).

Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by EDHA 2026

Journal Information

  • Vol. 22 (2026): 2026 3rd International Conference on the Frontiers of Social Sciences, Education, and the Development of Humanities Arts (EDHA 2026)
  • 2026-06-13
  • ISSN: (Print) 3078-770X/ (Online) 3078-7718
  • Journal Homepage

Related Articles